ON POSSIBLE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE THE SITUATION OF WOMEN         IN PHYSICS

 

L. Meza-Montesa and  A.M. Cettob

 

a  Instituto de Física, UAP, Apdo. Postal J-48 Puebla, Pue. México 72570

b Instituto de Física, UNAM. ana@fisica.unam.mx

 

A recent report of the National Commission on Women (Conmujer, a governmental institution) in Mexico,[1] draws attention to the crucial age at which the gap between genders in education starts: at eleven years the highest  percentage of women  abandon school. In contrast, at higher educational levels female desertion becomes smaller than male. Thus, in graduate programs 41 % are female students on the average, the figures being considerably lower in the natural sciences. The National System of Researchers (SNI), a governmental institution that grants fellowships according to individual accomplishment in scientific work, includes  28% female members, with only 14% in the fields of Physics and Mathematics.

Certainly, the issue is not just one of numbers; it is one of opportunities and of the wealth of potential that women provide. As in other fields of human activity, an increased female participation in science should make a difference not just for women but also for science.[2]

In Physics, 9% of the faculty members are women, according to the Ibero-American Catalogue of Programs and Human Resources.[3] In the case of Mexico, out of these approx.170 women, 22, 46 and 108 have bachelor, master and Ph.D. degrees, respectively. The global trend in the geographical distribution is neatly reflected: the scientific community is concentrated in the capital, with 110 of these women working in Mexico City, while 24 of  the 49 centers include only one or no woman physicist at any level.

The figures are definitively critical, however the proportion can be more favorable than in some other countries. Two factors may contribute to this: first, some fields are relatively new in our country. Historical facts, such as political instability and lack of institutional interest in science, did not allow the development of scientific centers in the past.  Physics as a professional career started  basically when the first Institute of Physics was founded in 1938 and one year later the first school was created, both in UNAM, in Mexico City. The first attempt in the provinces took place in 1950. This means that physics has developed within a more contemporary, liberal environment, with less sexist bias and preconceptions than is found in countries with a longer tradition. Another possible factor can be our educational system, for basically most of the high school programs include science courses, even if the student does not take it as a major field. This fact allows women to test their capabilities and discover that they can afford to follow a scientific career. Of course, a deeper analysis is necessary but these reflections can give some insight on the cultural differences in the participation of women in physics.

Recently some efforts to confront gender inequality in science and find ways to overcome it have taken place. Since 1990, the bulletin Supercuerdas (Superstrings) for women in science, published in Mexico, has served as a means to establish contact with colleagues from other institutions in the country and in Latin America, and as a forum for the analysis and debate of problems encountered by women in science.[4]

Strategies have been suggested to increase the participation of women in scientific jobs, such as: guaranteeing equal opportunities in education, providing professional orientation, and reviewing the evaluation of work to provide equality; and campaigns to modify traditional roles have been developed by Conmujer and several other groups. Further, institutional actions are in progress, like the one initiated by the SNI, namely the extension of the membership period by an additional year for scientists who got pregnant, as a recognition that this circumstance has a negative impact on their productivity.

Nevertheless, we have to work out several aspects, some of which are closely related to our specific circumstances, particularly the social situation. A recent regional meeting has discussed some of the issues at length.[5] Let us emphasize some of them: lack of support to physicists with children keeps them in a marginal situation, young students do not have access to childcare services and very often this reduces their possibility of fulfilling requirements to obtain a fellowship, the attitude of our male colleagues is still sexist, etc. Very importantly, the way science is taught in elementary and high school and the biased expectations of school teachers and parents towards girls vs. boys, are seen to negatively influence the female choice of scientific careers.

Conferences like the present one give us an opportunity to exchange experiences and collectively try to find ways to improve the situation. As an example of the importance of such actions, we recall the five regional preparatory UNESCO meetings that produced an input for the World Conference on Science, which is now reflected in the commitments of governments and institutions contained in the Conference documents.[6] It is very important to organize events as this one since, as said before, a significant part of us develop our activities in a gender-imbalanced environment. Panels with men participation on topics as the ones considered in the Conference may contribute to make our colleagues more sensitive to these issues, reflect on them and change their attitude.

International campaigns (like the ones organized by UNESCO  and UNIFEM  on gender equality, for example the contest ‘Children Views on Science in the XXI Century’) have an influence on the population. They  can be more specifically devoted to attract young females and  promoting  women scientists, and should be reinforced with activities of  local female scientists. Recommendations to governments and monitoring are always helpful; international actions give strong support to national activities.



[1] Programa Nacional de la Mujer-SEGOB, México.  http://www.datasys.com/conmujer

[2] A.M. Cetto. Papel de la mujer en la transformación de las ciencias: una óptica diferente. Reprinted in Supercuerdas 11-12 (2001), p. 9.

[3] Catálogo Iberoamericano de Programas y Recursos Humanos en Física. Sociedad Mexicana de Física-FeLaSoFi, México 2001. This Catalogue includes data on the major bachelor and graduate programs and research centers in Latin America and Spain.

[4] Supercuerdas, issues nos. 1 – 12 (1990-2001). This bulletin is an independent publication that serves the Latin American branch of the Third World Organization for Women in Science  (TWOWS). http://www.arce0.fciencias.unam/supercuerdas.html

[5] Women, Science and Technology in Latin America: Diagnosis and Strategies. Regional UNESCO Meeting, Bariloche, Argentina, 1998.

[6] Science for the Twenty-first Century – A new commitment. Documents of the UNESCO-ICSU World Conference on Science. http://www.unesco.science.org/science/wcs

 

(Se publicará en el libro de reportes que editará IUPAP)